Phase shift between harmonics from same price tendency or rope had been already explained.
But multiplicate the harmonics phase split by the number of different trend rope and you plot the resultant of each. You have now a "3D" model of phase where the rope not connected to the market by amplitude doesn't affect anymore the market price by depreciation (Elasticity of the market generates a gap with a cement base btw the elastic mastress).
As the next rope (a huge on) coming with its own huge short/pump waves harmonics army is far (arround 325$), the price need to find back a support from waves oscillating arround ropes which couldn't catch up the trend. Correction is likely to happen :)!
But multiplicate the harmonics phase split by the number of different trend rope and you plot the resultant of each. You have now a "3D" model of phase where the rope not connected to the market by amplitude doesn't affect anymore the market price by depreciation (Elasticity of the market generates a gap with a cement base btw the elastic mastress).
As the next rope (a huge on) coming with its own huge short/pump waves harmonics army is far (arround 325$), the price need to find back a support from waves oscillating arround ropes which couldn't catch up the trend. Correction is likely to happen :)!