Unlike AUDUSD, it seems that we have a healthy uptrend building on this pair. Expect a continuation of the up ove before we retrace to the buy zone.
IMPORTANT NOTE: First I'd like to thank you for your support and interest in The PanOptic Trading Method. Second, I'd like to thank Tradingview for providing such a great place where we can share our ideas and talk about our interest in trading.
Please note that starting on the 1st of August, all my charts which I publish here will be exclusively using the "KS Method" which represents the base of the PanOptic Trading Method.
I will also privately publish a more advanced version of how you can trade those same charts through my blog (coming soon), 'twitter (twitter.com/panoptic_method) and 'facebook (facebook.com/Ichimoku.PanOptic/). The private charts will also be on Tradingview but will only be accessible through those channels and I will always mention publishing the more advanced versions on the published charts. So please take some time to follow me there.
My blog will have my PanOptic Trading Method material (very well organized) as well as my trades. So please be patient and give me some time to organize that for you.
Thank you for your continuous support.
Kommentare
aziz.au
⋅
Hi Ichi thanks, what is the reason that you have opposite bias on NU and AU published in H4?
Ichimoku_Trader
⋅
We follow the market... ;)
aziz.au
⋅
could you explain a bit more... NU price broke above kumo, so is in AU. Both KS looking up. But SSB NU looking up, AU flat. Is this the reason?
Ichimoku_Trader
⋅
Sounds like a good reason. ok
Subtle-trader
⋅
Hi,
I have the same question. Any particular reason that AUD is bearish but NZD is bullish?
Subtle-trader
⋅
I have the same question. Any particular reason that AUD is bearish but NZD is bullish?
Subtle-trader
⋅
I have the same question. Any particular reason that AUD is bearish but NZD is bullish?
Ichimoku_Trader
⋅
If they were moving together 100% they would be the same currency. Maybe next week they will align again and maybe they will not
Let's see